[SailfishDevel] SMS for m2m communication

[kaa]

Mikael .. I was understand .. debian's apt-like solvers are not good as 
zypper. You not know all good possibilities .. :)

Kaacz


Dne 29.3.2014 18:03, kaa at iol.cz napsal(a):
>
> Mikael, know you things: opensource, git, OBS service .. ??? With 
> those things, openrepos wil be nice and safe place for users with 
> brain. More safe then closed app in Harbour.
>
> I like ideas as Maemo4-extras repo - only one way to this repo exist: 
> automatic build from opensource "git" place. I know "this binary is 
> builded from exact this sources".
>
>
> Last words: exist more open and more safe solutions then Harbour only. :)
>
>
> PS: problem "upgrade vs openrepos" packages is easy. High level apps 
> (GUI) are not possible to break OS by simply "install". Unofficial 
> libraries or OS tools: yes (problem with bash in last update). But: 
> when OS reposes are wrong defined (without priorities), in this case 
> is easy to destroy OS by any 3party package. I have openSUSE with 
> zypper 5 years on few PC. With good priority setting isn't possible to 
> break OS with worst priority unsupported packages. :)
>
>
> PPS: excuse me for ugly english..
>
>
> Radek "Kaacz" K.
>
> --
>
> Sent from Nokia N9 :)
>
>
> Dne 29.03.2014 12:22 napsal uz(ivatel Mikael Hermansson:
>
> On Monday 24 March 2014 21.26.31 kaa at iol.cz <mailto:kaa at iol.cz> wrote:
> > Sad. Apps type as SuperSMS or PhoneAssistant (as on N9) not possible on
> > Harbour. Good save openrepos. :) OK. My attention is more focussed to
> > openrepos than harbour .. :)
>
>
> Hmm, your signature is kinda ironic ;) One of the reason harbour does not
> allow SMS is to be safe from risk for developers not misuse or by 
> mistake send
> SMS:ses without user knows it or viruses, malware etc?
>
> Now you prefer unsafe operrepos thats allows everything. And we 
> already knows
> people got problems with they'r phone when upgrade to latest version 
> and some
> (not all) reasons are because of apps in openrepos.
>
> I dont say openrepos is bad BUT restrictions is needed for reasons. 
> Openrepos
> is a playground for testers and developers which can be great. But NOT
> something I recommend for endusers software.
>
> As stated here already I think there need to use an more controlled extra
> repos at merproject where developers can upload apps that later easy 
> can be
> pushed to harbour. And harbour- suffix should not be allowed on 
> openrepos IMHO.
>
> Point is developers should still support harbour as number one and 
> instead
> push ideas how to implement X/Y/Z without risk for malware/viruses etc...
> I do not beleive openrepos is the solution.
>
>
>
> -- 
> Sent from my Lenovo Thinkpad X230 running Kubuntu desktop
> _______________________________________________
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.sailfishos.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140329/0956189d/attachment.html>