<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">8.11.2013 16:18, Marcin M.:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CANaCrSTbyy3qxQtGozJ0EcYmhUQpsAYo8AG5P_QVEczFSd+LFQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>Well, this all anty-piracy campaign is going too far!
                :) Who lives by the sword, dies by the sword. <br>
                <br>
                1. People who won't have money - won't buy. If they
                can't use the apps, they won't use the system. And
                choose Android/Jailbroken iOS<br>
              </div>
              2. It's becoming a little spy-like to send data from
              device to the manufacturer's servers! It's not IE to
              access internet from your device and vice versa<br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    I'll point to all the criticism Canonical is currently facing due to
    the DASH privacy issues & their botched handling of it (most
    recent being the fixubuntu case).<br>
    <br>
    Also regarding the previously mentioned IMEI checking, just
    something to think about in regards of leaking the IMEI:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/12/09/08/2126234/whatsapp-is-using-imei-numbers-as-passwords">http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/12/09/08/2126234/whatsapp-is-using-imei-numbers-as-passwords</a><br>
     <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CANaCrSTbyy3qxQtGozJ0EcYmhUQpsAYo8AG5P_QVEczFSd+LFQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>3. How can we detect if someone installed a free version
            from "<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://talk.maemo.org"
              target="_blank">talk.maemo.org</a>" instead of buying the
            same version from Harbor? What about being given the package
            by the developer?<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          <div>I think that there's no use in write a complicated copy
            protection library. The optimal option is to just make
            installing (just using CLI would discourage many). If
            someone wants to crack, he'll crack anyway or not use the
            platform at all.<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          <div>And... Losing warranty after dev mode? Please elaborate.<br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Also interested to hear a clarification to this.<br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CANaCrSTbyy3qxQtGozJ0EcYmhUQpsAYo8AG5P_QVEczFSd+LFQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <br>
        </div>
        Regards,<br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
        <div>
          <div>--</div>
          Marcin<br>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2013/11/8 Andrey Kozhevnikov <span
            dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:coderusinbox@gmail.com" target="_blank">coderusinbox@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            Well. As Harmattan havent copy protection at all, developers
            started creating own methods for detecting if application is
            *really* bought by user. And it was done using osa binaries.
            You can always get application source, and if it osa -
            application installed from Store (means paid applicatioin
            was bought).<br>
            <br>
            I see following:<br>
            <br>
            Lightweight library provides methods for developer to detect
            if application installed from Harbour (bought actually) or
            not. Daemon side of library handles this calls and send
            negative results to Harbour servers. This protection library
            should provide also some kind of *sandbox*. Functions,
            included into sandbox will be executed in safe threads and
            will be self-obfuscated and protected from modifications.
            Any byte changing *sandbox* part of application cause
            showing warning screen when application starting,
            application became misbehave or quiting after some period of
            time, and sending information to Harbour servers.<br>
            <br>
            And developer can choose which strategy application will
            use: easy or hard, or make own methods based on easy *is
            bought?* checks.
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5"><br>
                <br>
                On 08.11.2013 12:02, Jonni Rainisto wrote:<br>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    That's good, but what I don't get in that case is...
                    does that<br>
                    coincidentally mean "enable developer mode" ==
                    "disable copy protection"?<br>
                  </blockquote>
                  It doesn't mean that.  It will be lightweight, does
                  not limit resources and does not care what mode you
                  are on. People will just have to wait for untill its
                  ready before more datails will be available. But feel
                  free to give suggestions what kind of API's you would
                  prefer to have as a developer in Harbour to make your
                  life easier.<br>
                  <br>
                  re, Jonni<br>
                  ________________________________________<br>
                  From: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:devel-bounces@lists.sailfishos.org"
                    target="_blank">devel-bounces@lists.sailfishos.org</a>
                  [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:devel-bounces@lists.sailfishos.org"
                    target="_blank">devel-bounces@lists.sailfishos.org</a>]
                  on behalf of Attila Csipa [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:qt@csipa.in.rs" target="_blank">qt@csipa.in.rs</a>]<br>
                  Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 2:37 AM<br>
                  To: Mohammed Hassan; Sailfish OS Developers<br>
                  Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Jolla Harbour and Jolla
                  Store<br>
                  <br>
                  On 07-Nov-13 15:51, Mohammed Hassan wrote:<br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      Not quite :) What I'm interested in is what *will*
                      be there (or,<br>
                      rather, what resources will it limit) as opposed
                      to what is NOT<br>
                      going to be there (whether not having Aegis there
                      is good, or bad,<br>
                      depends on what you will have there instead is
                      better or worse than<br>
                      Aegis).<br>
                    </blockquote>
                    As Jonni said:<br>
                    After you enable developer mode, you have _true_
                    root access to the device<br>
                    and can freely replace system binaries and do what
                    ever you want with your<br>
                    device (you may lose warranty when you enable
                    developer mode).<br>
                  </blockquote>
                  That's good, but what I don't get in that case is...
                  does that<br>
                  coincidentally mean "enable developer mode" ==
                  "disable copy protection"?<br>
                  <br>
                  Best regards,<br>
                  Attila<br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list<br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list<br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list<br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>