[SailfishDevel] Right to silence

[Filip Kłębczyk]

W dniu 23.05.2014 09:02, Jarko Vihriala pisze:
>
>I don't deal with developer relations or alike - for that there is Iekku and other people.

In practice Iekku almost gave her voice completely to Stefano on this 
mailing list when it comes to developer relations. Also community 
manager Carol Chen didn't write anything on this matter. I wonder what 
for are those functions/titles (developer care relations, community 
manager) if those persons don't speak at all on this important matter 
impacting both developer relations and community.

I hope Jolla finds courage and will agree to publish all the mails 
Developer Care sent and also if Iekku agrees to publish her mails she 
sent to me on this case with dates (if she doesn't want the mails from 
Developer Care are enough). Then everybody will be able to judge himself 
if the topic was ignored or not (facts Stefano, facts that you wanted, 
don't you?).

The problem as it seen from the last mails is complex and deserves fair 
treatment. Again there was my proposal for mediation, which wasn't 
discussed at the meeting as I've asked.

Also I don't think that statements saying that this problem is a 
complete private thing between me and Thomas Perl are correct. If 
Carsten said that one of the reasons that I cannot work in Jolla is his 
fear that Thomas would probably exit the company, when I would join, 
then I think it clearly shows the conflict affected decisions made on 
company side at least by Carsten.

Also Carsten has written in his mails:
"I understand that there may be two schools of thoughts here - that the
person on the other side of the McDonalds' counter is a faceless
automaton only there to serve customers.. or that the person on the
other side of the counter is a human with feelings, relations, rights
and worries."

Ok so you are stating here that there are two approaches where someones 
private area can or not influences his work. If you prefer second option 
then the big problem is to what point it can influence his actions at 
work when having personal conflicts. Where is the border?

Let me give you an example if someone works in Ministry of 
Enviroment/Ecology and after hours throws trash to the forest, how would 
you call that? What ministry should answer if someone asks about that 
duality?

If someone as employee talks about hacking event on Together (Jolla 
official communication channel) and then on IRC of that event says 
(privately or not) that he excludes one of the community members from 
taking part in that event, how do you call that? Do you see similarities 
with the previous example?

So taking the two cases into account:
a) Thomas trying to exclude me from the event (let's assume privately)
b) Thomas not answering only my questions (answering others) on official 
channel (Harbour was pointing to it) as Jolla employee

1. If someone will state that work and private areas influence each 
other, then you are giving power to point a), that can be considered as 
discrimination/abuse.

2. If someone will state (opposite to point 1) that work and private 
areas can be completely divided/separated then you give power to point 
b) as a discrimination.

You see inconsistency in Jolla behavior? It's logic, something with what 
technical people should be familiar with.

Regards,
Filip