[SailfishDevel] Deploy as RPM Package vs Deploy By Building As RPM Package

[Sven Putze]

That wording could use some adjustments :-)

On 07.01.2014, at 13:33, Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof at gmail.com> wrote:

> "Deploy by Building an RPM Package" really means: "Just build an RPM and don't deploy".
> 
> 
> Timur
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:30 PM, David Greaves <david.greaves at jolla.com> wrote:
> On 06/01/14 16:21, christopher.lamb at thurweb.ch wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > In QtCreator for the Sailfish i486-x86 Target I have two options
> >
> > "Deploy as Binaries"
> >
> > and
> >
> > "Deploy as RPM Package"
> >
> > For the Sailfish Arm target there is a third option
> >
> > "Deploy by Building an RPM Package"
> >
> > What is the difference between "Deploy as RPM Package" and "Deploy By Building
> > As RPM Package"?
> 
> If you want an ARM rpm (eg for the Harbour) but don't yet have a device.
> 
> Note that since there's no run option you have to do a manual deploy from the menu.
> 
> David
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list